Uneasy Money: BIP-361 Wants to Freeze Satoshi's Coins. What Happens If It Passes?

A wide-ranging debate on Bitcoin’s quantum-threat response, token-holder rights, platform risks, and the controversial idea of freezing dormant Satoshi coins.

Key Takeaways

Discusses BIP361 and radical defenses against quantum attacks—options include freezing old/non‑quantum wallets, 90‑day hard deadlines, or phased 3–5 year upgrade timelines; social consensus is essential.
Warns token buyers: tokens often grant no legal rights—examples include Curve and World Liberty disputes—so require explicit enforceable terms and shorter, enforceable timelines.
Highlights platform and operational risks: DNS hijacks, social engineering, X’s cash‑tag changes, chain migrations (Etherfy/Scroll), and sudden fee spikes can lock or strand users.
Examines Satoshi authorship theories and risks: multiple origin hypotheses, theft concerns if quantum breaks signatures, and the heated proposal to lock Satoshi’s dormant coins.
Calls out Bitcoin governance culture: white‑paper fundamentalism, gatekeeping, and past fork wars make coordination hard—urge clearer upgrade processes and preemptive planning.

Original Source

Visit Source